What are your strengths and weaknesses?

"The interview screen was pretty straightforward. The hiring manager screen is mainly behavioral and assessing your product style and fit"

"There were a lot of probing questions that followed after each question. One good thing was that the hiring manager was pasting each question she asked on the chat, so that I could follow through."

"Easy enough. They go narrow and deep on the homework assignments. Answer the questions as is. Do not question the question."

"Overall pretty straightforward, their interviews are pretty standard and are not there to surprise you. Recruiter and interviewers were professional."

"Easy interview, everyone was friendly. It felt more like a conversation than an interview. Really dive deep on your past expriences, be ready to speak on the technical knowledge and how YOU contributed in your role as opposed to what you did with other people in your team."

"This role was pretty niche and felt like a mix of chief of staff and TPM supporting a really large engineering organization. The process was recruiter screen, then the hiring manager, then a team screen with peers, then conversations with the engineering directors I would support and their managers. It was a lengthy loop and most of it was behavioral or simulation based. There were not many technical components to it and it was not really a case interview. The whole thing was much more about how I would operate inside the org than about technical depth."

"It was a very long process. Got to Team matching phase, but wasn't able to match after several tentatives. The rounds after the full loop (where I got mixed rating) were harder than the techinical ones."

"The process was straightforward and moved pretty quickly. I had to download an external app to do the video-call interviews. The questions were standard product questions and the interviewers seemed to be going through the motions (i.e. not particularly prepped)."