Skip to main content

Real Interview Experiences

Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.

Updated 9 hours ago
Share your experience or upgrade to unlock access

Interviewed recently? Share your experience to try it free, or become a member for full access.

Google
Product Manager
Google·Posted 3 months ago · Jul 2024

“What went well was my effort and organization. What didn't go well was time management. Next time, I would start earlier and ask for help sooner if I needed it. What stands out to me is how well this role matches my background and goals. The interview has also given me a good sense of a professional and supportive team culture.”

2 rounds2 questions
Read full interview
Amazon
Machine Learning Engineer
Amazon·Posted 3 months ago · Jul 2024

“The interview loop was definitely more AI/ML focused than software focused. There was no leetcode really, but I did have to write a simple KNN algorithm from scratch.”

4 rounds3 questions
Read full interview
Oracle
Software Engineer
Oracle·Posted 4 weeks ago · Jul 2024

“oVERALL Interview process was easy. You need to have a well-rounded knowledge of DSA, OOPS, DBMS, and some puzzles.”

3 rounds
Read full interview
Microsoft
Software Engineer
Microsoft·Posted 3 months ago · Jul 2024

“The overall interview process was well-structured and organized. The interviewers were professional, friendly, and gave me sufficient time to think through problems and discuss my approach. I appreciated that the rounds covered a good mix of coding, design, and behavioral topics, allowing me to demonstrate both technical depth and problem-solving skills. What went well was the technical discussion around system design and real-world engineering challenges. The interviewers encouraged clarifying questions and were interested in understanding my thought process, trade-off analysis, and experience operating large-scale systems. The coding problems were relevant and allowed for meaningful follow-up discussions around optimization and scalability. One area that could have gone better was time management during some of the coding rounds. While I arrived at correct solutions, I spent more time than expected discussing edge cases and alternative approaches, which left less time for implementation refinements and testing. In hindsight, I could have balanced exploration and execution more effectively. Overall, it was a positive experience. The process felt fair, technically challenging, and reflective of the engineering problems one would encounter in the role. I also enjoyed interacting with the interviewers and learning more about the team's work and technical challenges.”

1 round
Read full interview
Meta
Software Engineer
Meta·Posted 5 months ago · Jul 2024

“Initially considered for IC6 but performed poorly in the system design so got down-leveled to IC5. For IC6 consider how your system interacts with other systems.”

3 rounds
Read full interview
Google
Product Manager
Google·Posted 2 weeks ago · Jun 2024

“It was a very long process. Got to Team matching phase, but wasn't able to match after several tentatives. The rounds after the full loop (where I got mixed rating) were harder than the techinical ones.”

5 rounds4 questions
Read full interview
Atlassian
Product Manager
Atlassian·Posted 3 weeks ago · Jun 2024

“The process was clear and transparent. I knew who I needed to speak with next and what the process was going to be like ”

5 rounds7 questions
Read full interview
Infosys
Software Engineer
Infosys·Posted 1 month ago · Jun 2024

“Round 1: HackWithInfy Duration : 3 hours Format : 3 coding questions Easy to Medium Medium to Hard Hard I managed to solve: 60% of the test cases in Question 1 100% of the test cases in Question 3 Result: Shortlisted for the SP Role Interview Round 2: In-Person Interview at the Office Duration : ~1 hour 30 minutes Interview Flow : Self-introduction Discussion on the projects listed in my resume Reasons for choosing those projects Justification for the tech stacks used SQL: Join operations DSA: Question 1 (Medium) – Leetcode 54: Spiral Traversal (Explained the approach and wrote the pseudocode). DSA: Question 2 (Hard) – Leetcode 32: Longest Valid Parentheses (Started with the brute force approach and then gave the optimal solution). Puzzle – Pair of Socks (Was unable to give the correct answer on the first attempt, but later provided the correct solution with the interviewer's hint). Asked for feedback on areas of improvement Discussed relevant tech stacks to learn next I had mentioned in my resume that I teach DSA to my friends through online sessions. The interviewer appreciated this and encouraged me to continue.”

2 rounds1 question
Read full interview
Capital One
Business Analyst
Capital One·Posted 2 months ago · Jun 2024

“Strong Domain & Cultural Alignment: Deep familiarity with Capital One’s data-driven decision culture, framework-oriented problem solving, and internal risk/analytics architecture made the conversation natural and fluid.”

3 rounds2 questions
Read full interview
formerly Exponent

Get updates in your inbox with the latest tips, job listings, and more.

Follow Us

Products
Courses
Interview Questions
Interview Experiences
Popular articles
Guides
Coaching
For Partners
Company
Exponent Labs, LLC © 2026
Terms of Service | Privacy