Real Interview Experiences
Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.
Interviewed recently? Share your experience to try it free, or become a member for full access.

“It was a pretty standard interview. Didn’t have a single behavioral and everything was based on the technical, didn’t do perfectly, but still got the offer”

“It was as expected. SQL: First define the metrics and then code them Product sense: How do you measure the success of a product/feature type questions with follow-ups Probability and statistics with text book style problems and experimentation based questions ”

“Standardized”

“The process was fine and there was really little feedback during the interview so i couldnt tell how i did ”

“One of the technical rounds was ridiculous, a LC hard (LC3548) ML Systems Design was pretty standard - design a recommender system Behavioral round fairly standard”

“It had 1 Phone screen with 2 leetcode style questions the loop had: 1 behavioral 2 leetcode style rounds 1 ml system design (with 1 more follow up)”

“The technical rounds were generally well structured and covered both coding and system design. I performed well in most of the technical discussions, but I found the system design round more challenging. Overall, the process was professional and gave me a clear understanding of the technical expectations.”

“- everyone was super nice - questions were like leet code but with a twist - time complexity always asked”

“The bar for leetcode was lower for PE rather SWE, but there was 2 rounds on SRE debugging and Linux debugging.”
Preview full access of other recent interview experiences

“The weirdest Anthropic round was the company values interview. It was almost like a therapy session, and honestly if you went to a therapist at some point, you will pass that round much more easily.”

“What was very unusual is they didn’t give me any tooling to draw the system design, so I just sketched it on a piece of paper and talked them through it, then we got into this oddly deep debate about whether hover-over history should count as a recommendation signal.”